Solar Powered Headphones

Solar-Powered Headphones?

There’s a new crop of solar-powered wireless headphones on the market, tech site The Verge reports.

Why it matters: Headphones that get topped off by the sun’s rays could end the days of running out of juice while you’re out and about enjoying some tunes or making calls.

For example: There’s the Adidas RPT-2 Sol ($230), the Urbanista Los Angeles ($199), and the Blue Tiger Solare Headset ($220).

All currently only available in the US.

  • On the Adidas cans, solar cell material built into the headband doubles their wireless playback time compared to a similar non-solar model, from 40 hours to 80.

Sounds like a great idea until you factor in the weather in the UK, so they will probably get topped up during the odd heatwave and spend the rest of their time down the back of the sofa!

Great effort but no cigar…

Climate resilience hubs

“Climate Resilience Hubs”

As cities in the USA race to ramp up heat mitigation efforts, some are replacing bare-bones cooling centres with full-service “climate resilience hubs” — offering everything from comfy A/C and phone charging to social services and emergency training.

Why it matters: While “resilience hubs” are meant for everyone and all kinds of climate disasters, they’re particularly aimed at low-income residents and people of colour, who tend to suffer disproportionately as temperatures rise.

  • The idea is to meld the heat-relief imperative with social justice.

Driving the news: Chastened by heat waves that have often turned fatal, cities and states are starting to plan, fund and build climate resilience hubs — souped-up community centres modernised for the current heat – apocalypse.

  • Miami is at the forefront with its mobile “resilience hub” made from a 40-foot shipping container. It debuted two years ago and offers people a chilled, solar-powered place to gather, with Wi-Fi, phone charging and a suite of solutions for “food insecurity” — including fruit trees for people to plant.
  • Tempe, Arizona, has budgeted $2.3 million for EnVision Tempe, a one-stop resource centre that’ll have a big walk-in freezer and free ice — plus staff who can help visitors find a job, GED classes, housing assistance, parenting programs, etc.
  • Similar initiatives are underway in Austin, Seattle, Portland, Oregon, Northern California and elsewhere.

What they’re saying: “The evolution has happened pretty quickly” from cooling centres to the more expansive “climate resilience hub” model, says Kathy Baughman McLeod, director of the Atlantic Council’s Adrienne Arsht-Rockefeller Foundation Resilience Centre.

Cities are appointing “Chief Heat Officers “and “Chief Resilience Officers” who are pushing the hub model alongside various climate-focused non-profits.

  • The Inflation Reduction Act that passed in the Senate on last week sets aside $60 million for “environmental justice,” which could help communities build resilience hubs.

Yes, but: There are lots of challenges, from getting people to seek shelter during a heat emergency to conflicting visions of what “resilience hubs” should be and how they should operate — and ensuring that they function as more than de facto homeless shelters. 

  • Supplying water, electricity and other resources can be difficult, “especially when you consider the very real and increasing possibility of heat waves coinciding with blackouts or power failures,” says Rushad Nanavatty of RMI, a clean energy non-profit helping 10 Texas cities develop climate hubs.
  • Transportation is a big obstacle — particularly since the hubs aren’t always centrally located, according to a June study by University of Alberta scholars.

One model: Boston-based non-profit Communities Responding to Extreme Weather (CREW) built a network of 109 resilience hubs in college and municipal libraries.

  • Workers at CREW hubs distribute cooling kits and free air conditioners, mobilize neighbours to check on elderly residents and hold education sessions to help people prepare for projected local climate impacts.
  • “We think about climate resilience through social resilience,” the Rev. Vernon Walker, CREW’s program director.
  • A resilience Hub concept from another group, the Urban Sustainability Directors Network, focuses on disaster response and providing shelter.

The bottom line: As helpful as they could potentially be, most “resilience hubs” are still in the planning stages, so they’re too late for this summer — yet already long overdue.

It will be fascinating to see if the idea catches on in the UK given the multiple heatwaves we have endured this summer, and how ill prepared we are as a nation to tackle the effects of climate change, and the devastating impact it has had on several communities across the country.

Pay To Pod

Pay To Pod?

Some podcast guests are paying upwards of $50k to be interviewed on a show according to a report via Bloomberg.

Why it matters: The practice appears to be popular among business, cryptocurrency, and wellness genres with few listeners actually aware of it.

  • The lack of specific disclosures of paid appearances can only further erode trust in media and content.

How it works: Podcasters like Dave Asprey of “The Human Upgrade” told Bloomberg about 1% of his episodes feature paying guests who on average pay him $50,000 per appearance.

  • Lifestyle podcast “The Skinny Confidential Him and Her,” charges $20,000 to $40,000 an interview. 
  • The “Entrepreneurs on Fire” podcast currently charges $3,500 for an appearance. 
  • Podcasters pay guests too. Boxer Manny Pacquiao for example charges $15,000 for an appearance. 

The rationale: Podcasters practicing this business model tell Bloomberg that the payments serve as a filtering tool or as a substitute for traditional sponsored ad costs. 

The podcast industry — similarly to the influencer industry on social media — is taking advantage of a gap in oversight when it comes to how companies and individuals accept paid promotion.

  • There are clearer definitions for sponsored posts, ads, and paid contributors on traditional mediums like newspapers, television shows and display ads.

I’m clearly in the wrong business and if you’re reading this, you probably are too!

Instagram

The Growth of Alternative Instagram’s

Photographers, designers, and other creative types turned off by Instagram’s pivot to TikTok-like features are tentatively moving to alternative platforms.

Why it matters: Instagram has long been a digital gallery space for artists of all kinds, helping them find an audience, connect with other creatives, and land paid gigs. 

  • But the Meta-owned platform’s gradual evolution into an ad- and shopping-heavy app that favours short-form video and algorithmically selected content has left the future of digital art-sharing in flux.

The context: Instagram has been de-emphasising still imagery for years. But more recent changes, such as a focus on shopping and a big increase in the amount of suggested content that appears in users’ feeds, has forced a reckoning.

A handful of rival apps and platforms are reporting spikes in user activity.

  • They include relatively new upstarts, like Glass (for photographers of all kinds) and Grainery (for film photographers, specifically).
  • Even old favourites like Flickr — a pioneer in digital photography-sharing that owned the loyalty of serious photographers in the mid-2000s — are seeing a boost and some creatives are turning back to Tumblr, another long-time artist haven.
  • Others are also experimenting with e-newsletters.

What they’re saying: “We started working on Glass … because we felt like the photo community that existed on Instagram that built the back of Instagram doesn’t exist anymore,” says Glass head of community and marketing Daniel Agee.

  • Agee says that Instagram’s ad- and sales-supported model have made it a crummy place for artists trying to share their work.
  • By contrast, Glass is subscription-based, at $4.99/month.

Yes, but: None of these services is likely to rack up anywhere close to Instagram’s billion-plus users. Glass’s user base, for example, is in the mid-five-digit range. 

  • Choosing a strategy that doesn’t depend on mega-scale can make long-term sense — smaller online groups built around specific interests (like some small subreddits) tend to be healthier environments than huge free-for-all networks (like Twitter).
  • But scale helps creatives seeking to build reputations and sell stuff. Some will end up embracing video, and many will simply get used to Instagram’s changes.

The big picture: This is all part and parcel of the long-standing tension between creators and platforms. Creators have relied on apps like Instagram and YouTube to reach their audiences — leaving them exposed to the whims of the platforms and the kinds of content they prioritise.